While some
aspects of police work have been studied in depth — for example, police
decision making in connection with an arrest — very little is known about the
way in which detectives work toward identifying suspects in serial murder
investigations. In order for the classification of serial murderers to be more
than educated guess work, conclusions must be based on empirical research of
consistencies in criminal behavior, and the relationship of those actions to
aspects of an offender that are available to the police in an investigation.
There can
be certain thematic behaviors in any murder committed by a sample of serial
murderers that are more typical than behaviors in similar murders; therefore there
will be consistency across the three offense series for the offender samples. Despite of the fact that the descriptive label
is applied, profiling as an investigative tool today represents a less than
educated attempt to provide law enforcement agencies with detailed information
about the behavior of an unknown individual who has committed a crime. Profiling
serial murderers should proceed on the assumption that to understand crimes of
this nature, we need to consider psychological issues relevant to behavior in
general — for example, the offender’s perception and interpretation of his
actions and their likely consequences, and the emotional framework within which
the person operates. Crime scene behavior, like any other behavior, is a
function of the whole personality of the individual. Human behavior does not
take place in a vacuum, but occurs in a concrete social situation. Hence, the
specific circumstances of a set of actions between offender and victim need to
be understood in order to give a useful account of any related behavior.
A model of
any violent crime, especially that of serial murder, should be built on the
central hypothesis that offenders differ in their actions when committing
crimes and that these differences reflect different interactions between the
offender and victim. The research has tended to combine accounts of crime scene
actions with explanations of motivations, intentions, personality attributes, and
other inferred offender characteristics.
‘(…)A serial murder, whether committed for sexual sadistic purposes or revenge,
is just a label for what is, in fact, quite complex behavior. However, this
label tells us little about the individual who carries out that attitude.(…)’
The first
serial murderer type is one who struggles against his impulses. his crimes are
disorganized, and he often leaves his crime scenes in disarray. this type of
killer is driven by sadistic sexual urges, seeking to humiliate his victims. Lust
drives them to murder brutally, restlessly, almost without end.
All killers
have different cognitive perceptions of their victims before and during a crime
which reflect the personal narratives of these men in their everyday life. One
possibly is that serial murderers, who see their victims as “vehicles” on which
to vent their anger and rage, could kill repeatedly to re-enact impersonal,
fearful attachment conflicts. Serial murderers see their victims as objects, a
kind of prop for acting out their sadistic torture and sexual fantasies. These
types of serial murderers express dismissing attachment. Dismissing attachment
is a term applied to individuals who are selfassured; for example, they exhibit
controlling and calculating behavior.
There are
a number of ways in which associations between crime scene behaviors of serial
murderers can be established. The framework adopted in this study is
characterized as a psycho-social behavioral approach, in which the offenders’
interactions with their victims will tell us how they carry out their crimes,
and subsequently how consistent they are from one offense to another. Crime
scene actions that show associations between offenses will help classify
behavior into common themes. Implicit is the need to identify those behavioral
traces at a crime scene which can be used as variables for this research. Such
traces of behavior may be seen as discrete acts, which constitute one element
within a series of actions which combine to form an underlying structure to a
crime scene.
The
general hypotheses central to this research are:
1. Serial
murderers will display certain crime scene behaviors that they share in common;
2. There
will be groups of serial murderers who will consistently display signature behaviors
that are more typical than any other group;
3. The
analysis of the data will reveal four thematic, mutually exclusive regions that
make up the offender’s modes of interaction with his victims. The four themes
of behavior are:
•
Affective-Vehicle
•
Affective-Object
•
Cognitive-Vehicle
• Cognitive-Object
All of
these aspects of offense behavior might be identified in details of an actual
event and they therefore would combine to provide a composite model of serial
murderers’ offense behavior. Such an empirical model would be expected to have
an interpretable structure to it.
The
dominant crime scene behaviors of serial murderers. The following variables or
actions are central:
Victim’s
body hidden
Body moved
Victim
found nude
Offender
pre-selected a weapon
Personal
items stolen from victim
Victim
bound by rope
Victim’s
clothing ripped/torn
Weapon a
knife
Anal
assault
Vaginal
assault
The ten behaviors listed
A
completely emotional, unplanned murder where the victim is treated as a
vehicle. The following affective-vehicle (AV) thematic variables that
co-occurred in this region are:
- Weapon hands/feet;
- Victim’s body left openly
displayed;
- Attempt sexual assault;
- Semen found at crime scene;
- Victim’s clothing
scattered;
- Restraint found at crime
scene;
- Restraint victim’s
clothing;
- Crime occurred in a house;
- Crime at victim’s resident;
- Victim’s property
ransacked;
- Forced entry;
- Entry made during the
night;
- Victim found fully dressed;
- Weapon found at crime
scene;
- Weapon of opportunity;
- Victim’s vehicle stolen;
For
example, the cognitive-object thematic behaviors mentioned above indicated
planning, such as using a con approach and destroying forensic evidence, were
consistently plotted as neighbors with post-mortem sex, inserting objects,
disfiguring the body, and anthropophagy. Similar behaviors were plotted as
neighbors in the cognitive-vehicle thematic region. For example, drugging the
victim and the use of a blindfold plotted together in all the offense series. These
actions suggest pre-planning.
The Police Department;
https://www.politie.nl/mijnbuurt/politiebureaus/05/burgwallen.html and a Chief Inspector – Mr. Erik Akerboom
©
Bibliography:
1. Criminal Investigations – Crime
Scene Investigation.2000
2. Forensic Science.2006
3. Techniques of Crime Scene
Investigation.2012
4. Forensics Pathology.2001
5. Pathology.2005
6. Forensic DNA Technology (Lewis
Publishers,New York, 1991).
7. The Examination and Typing of
Bloodstains in the Crime Laboratory (U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, D.C., 1971).
8. „A Short History of the
Polymerase Chain Reaction". PCR
Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology.
9. Molecular Cloning: A
Laboratory Manual (3rd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor ,N.Y. : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press.2001
10. "Antibodies as Thermolabile Switches: High
Temperature Triggering for the Polymerase Chain Reaction". Bio/Technology.1994
11. Forensic Science Handbook, vol. III (Regents/Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
12. "Thermostable DNA Polymerases for a Wide Spectrum
of Applications: Comparison of a Robust Hybrid TopoTaq to other enzymes".
In Kieleczawa J. DNA Sequencing
II: Optimizing Preparation and Cleanup. Jones and Bartlett. 2006
13. "Microscale chaotic advection enables robust
convective DNA replication.". Analytical
Chemistry. 2013
14. Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and
Biochemistry (U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice,
Washington, D.C.,1983).
15. C. A. Villee et al., Biology (Saunders College
Publishing, Philadelphia, 2nd ed.,1989).
16. Molecular Biology of the Gene (Benjamin/Cummings
Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 4th ed., 1987).
17. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Plenum Press, New
York,1985).
18. Human Physiology. An Integrate. 2016
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz