There are various ways to classify types of criminal homicide. State
statutes distinguish between criminal and non-criminal homicides, degrees of
murders, and types of manslaughters. Law enforcement agencies often categorize
homicides according to the characteristics of the offender (e.g., gang versus
non-gang), the victim (e.g., child murders, teen violence, elderly victims), or
situational context or attributes (e.g., domestic violence, stranger assaults,
drive-by shootings, robbery- murders, road rage, or workplace homicides). Lawyers,
social scientists, and law enforcers also classify homicides in terms of
motive. Common motives for homicides include trivial altercations, jealousy,
revenge, romantic triangles, robbery, sexual assault, burglary, and disputes in
drug transactions. The research examines whether instrumental and expressive homicides
are qualitatively different in their social context (i.e., combinations of
offender, victim, and situational characteristics). We do this empirically by
identifying the most prevalent combinations of individual and situational elements
unique to each type of homicide, as well as those common to both, through a
systematic process of holistic comparison. The distinction between instrumental
and expressive crimes has been widely used in criminological research.
Instrumental crimes are those conducted for explicit, future goals (such as to
acquire money or improve one’s social position), whereas expressive offenses
are often unplanned acts of anger, rage, or frustration. The instrumental–expressive
distinction often parallels the differences between planned (premeditated) and
spontaneous (“heat of passion”) offenses. Violent crimes are often
distinguished from other offenses (like corporate crime) based on their
relative frequency of instrumental and expressive motives. Expressive crimes
are often viewed as undeterrable by legal sanctions. Other crime prevention and
intervention strategies are also tied directly to the instrumental–expressive
distinction. Killings that occur in the commission of another felony are the
most commonly classified instrumental homicides. While many homicides in these
felony-type circumstances are often a side effect of another criminal act, these killings are usually classified as
instrumental crimes because the death of the victim is a potentially expected
outcome in the pursuit of the primary goal. Even expressive acts of violence
done in anger reflect an instrumental reaction to perceived wrongdoing. Instrumental
homicides involve all felony-type circumstances such as robbery, rape,
burglary, drug offenses, motor vehicle theft, and other felony-type situations.
While murders that occur during robberies are often portrayed as the ultimate
instrumental homicide, they share a similar social context to instrumental
homicides in only about one third of these crimes. Fewer than 10% of homicides
involving narcotic law violations or gambling have social contexts that are
unique to instrumental homicides, with the vast majority of these homicides
involving combinations of individual and situational factors that are common to
both instrumental and expressive homicides.
The most important conclusion that comes up from the analysis is that
characterization of homicides as either instrumental, expressive, or a combination
of the two is a complex issue. The treatment of instrumental-expressive crimes
as a simple dichotomy results in a gross misrepresentation of both.
Acknowledgements
The Police Department;
https://www.politie.nl/mijnbuurt/politiebureaus/05/burgwallen.html and a Chief Inspector – Mr. Erik Akerboom
©
Bibliography:
1. Criminal Investigations – Crime
Scene Investigation.2000
2. Forensic Science.2006
3. Techniques of Crime Scene
Investigation.2012
4. Forensics Pathology.2001
5. Pathology.2005
6. Forensic DNA
Technology (Lewis Publishers,New York, 1991).
7. The Examination and Typing of
Bloodstains in the Crime Laboratory (U.S. Department of Justice,
Washington, D.C., 1971).
8. „A Short History of the
Polymerase Chain Reaction". PCR
Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology.
9. Molecular Cloning: A
Laboratory Manual (3rd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor ,N.Y. : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Press.2001
10. "Antibodies as Thermolabile Switches: High
Temperature Triggering for the Polymerase Chain Reaction". Bio/Technology.1994
11. Forensic Science Handbook, vol. III (Regents/Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
12. "Thermostable DNA Polymerases for a Wide Spectrum
of Applications: Comparison of a Robust Hybrid TopoTaq to other enzymes".
In Kieleczawa J. DNA Sequencing
II: Optimizing Preparation and Cleanup. Jones and Bartlett. 2006
13. "Microscale chaotic advection enables robust
convective DNA replication.". Analytical
Chemistry. 2013
14. Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and
Biochemistry (U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice,
Washington, D.C.,1983).
15. C. A. Villee et al., Biology (Saunders College
Publishing, Philadelphia, 2nd ed.,1989).
16. Molecular Biology of the Gene (Benjamin/Cummings
Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 4th ed., 1987).
17. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Plenum Press, New
York,1985).
18. Human Physiology. An Integrate. 2016
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz