More specifically, I seek to lend understanding to
those serial homicides committed specifically by women in dominant roles as
murderer. Women who acted alone or in concert with another where the accomplice
was in a subordinate role are also examined. Patterns suggest that women who
commit serial murder and are dominant tend to have significantly different patterns
of action when compared to those of men in the same role. Trends include, but
are not limited to, the following: women are less likely to use physical
violence, are more likely to use poison, are more likely to choose children and
men as part of their victim pool, and have a higher estimated kill ratio than
men. Implications of the lack of recognition of these killers’ actions for both
research and detection are discussed. Diverting the gaze from the acts of men,
however, to the more rare acts of women might serve to highlight some of our
sexual biases when we look at the criminal acts of women. The women outlined have stepped out of the more traditional role
and moved into another more dangerous social place: the offender class
comprised of serial murderers. These women often cloaked themselves in their
vulnerability, committing their atrocities in their own quiet way. What is
ironic, as this chapter demonstrates, is that historically when a woman has
made a habit of killing it does not attract attention. Her persona as the
“gentler sex” comes in conflict with her actions, and other explanations are
offered in an effort to rationalize the number of missing persons associated
with a particular woman. The killings, or attempted killings, take place over a
prolonged period of time with a cooling down period between homicides.
This killer class is more often male than female. The motives to these crimes are
often intensely personal, giving the outward appearance of randomness. Finally, as
is demonstrated in the pages that follow, whereas men have had motives that are
more often associated with sexual fantasy. Women
often commit these crimes for more instrumental reasons, such as financial
gain. Although these are predominant themes, it should be noted that the
reasons for murdering, for both men and women of this class, are varied and sex
does not ensure the motive type. Women are also more likely to exclusively target men over women; only three women targeted a victim pool comprised
only of women. In almost all
cases the victims of torture were adults or young adults. Women who used torture
operated in some sort of leading capacity, killing devotees, slaves, or servants
under their care. Not only is torture unusual, it is reflective of a more rare,
more complex social killing structure available to these women. The motives
changed depending on the individual circumstance. Some killed for more altruistic reasons, such as the
desire to free other women from the oppression of their husbands or to have their
children in heaven with them; or they simply felt that killing people was a form
of higher calling. Some killed those who interfered with their desire to marry,
and another killed to get more attention from a partner. One simply hated seeing
others being happy.The profiles that were created around this offender class
grew out of this social experience. They are backed by the typologies and
theoretical explanations of male violent behaviour. Women, as a subset of this
offender class are poorly explained by these ideas. Moreover women were
allotted the category of “compliant victim,” with the assumption that the women who participated in team
killings were coerced. Women are presently responsible for approximately 10% of all crime, but the types of crime in which women
are participating are changing. They are altering because women’s access to
opportunities is changing. It is interesting that, on one hand, women are
inhibited from entering into traditionally male roles and on the other
hand are treated, in many cases, like men. Women are categorized using definitions of behaviour and attitudes constructed in a male-dominated
social sphere; they are subject to court procedures that have traditionally dealt
with men and have been issued sentences equal to those of men. When sex
disparity emerges, it is often called preferential treatment. Equality within the
criminal justice system means treating a woman like a man, which in fact is not
equality. If it were, we would find the reverse to be equally palatable: Why not
treat men like women? The female serial murderer tends to be less violent and
more discreet than her male counterpart. Therefore, her crimes are less
likely to be noticed in the community, whereas the male serial murderer’s activities
are high profile. The death of his victims rarely escapes public attention. The
most common weapon of the female multiple murderer is poison. Male serial
murderers often use more violent methods of killing, including bludgeoning,
stabbing, strangulation, and mutilation. Women rarely overpower their victim to kill
them. The female serial murderer gains the victim’s trust in an effort to
find vulnerability, in contrast to the male serial murderer, who uses the
victim’s lack of physical strength as the primary weakness. Women do not need to change residence as much as men do in this offender class. This is because
the female serial murderer draws less attention to herself and to the death
of the victim. The murders she commits are considerably less obvious. She
often can effectively explain the sudden disappearance of an individual from
the trusted perspective of someone who was usually in close contact. The male serial
murderer, on the other hand, is more likely to kill people in different
communities, towns, cities, or states/provinces if he wishes to avoid detection. Serial murders by women are often accompanied by the
secondary crime of theft and ultimately fraud. Those by men are most
often accompanied by sexual assault. However, it has been also noted that
neither the male nor female serial murderers kill in order to commit these
secondary offenses. These other crimes are perpetrated because there is an
opportunity to do so. To take another’s life seems to be the primary motivating force
behind the murder. There are also other similarities between male and female
serial murderers. Both plan “traps” whereby the murderer could take
advantage of the victim. Men more often stalk their victims at various locations,
whereas women are more likely to lure the victim to a single location.
In either situation, the murderer rarely has control of who falls into this trap.
Each victim is chosen as the opportunity for the murderer presents itself. The
motives behind setting the traps, by the male or female murderer, are personal and
therefore undetectable to the public.
Finally, it
was noted that these particular sex divisions for serial murders are not to be considered descriptive models for these
offenses. It is likely that the changing trends in the larger society will affect
trends presently existing with regard to serial murder. It is predicted that as the
roles of men and women begin to assimilate, moving away from the
traditional models, so too will the identifying markers of the male and female
serial killers. Detection, and therefore the definition of serial murder,
is critical to the apprehension of these dangerous people. It is the
apparent random nature of the crime that makes the ability to identify a
homicide as the work of a serial murderer very difficult. Part of the difficulty
lies in the recognition that there indeed is a larger problem of definition. Although
serial murderesses have existed for centuries, as argued throughout this
chapter, they have been overlooked or placed in some other category of homicide.
Many of these women have been categorized with monikers such as “Black Widow”
or “Angel of Death” but have not been considered part of the larger
problem of serial murder. Therefore, in the future, an emphasis on incorporating
women into the serial murder equation should be implemented. Understanding that these are only approximations, and that data in this
area are somewhat problematic, it still appears that for those who come to
the public’s attention women historically appear to have been able to get away
with more murder largely because of their ability to artfully hide behind
presumptions of the “gentler sex.”
Acknowledgements:
The Police Department;
https://www.politie.nl/mijnbuurt/politiebureaus/05/burgwallen.html
and a Chief Inspector – Mr. Erik Akerboom
©
Bibliography:
1. Criminal Investigations – Crime Scene
Investigation.2000
2. Forensic Science.2006
3. Techniques of Crime Scene
Investigation.2012
4. Forensics Pathology.2001
5. Pathology.2005
6. Forensic DNA Technology (Lewis
Publishers,New York, 1991).
7. The Examination and Typing of Bloodstains
in the Crime Laboratory (U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1971).
8. „A Short History of the Polymerase Chain
Reaction". PCR Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology.
9. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
(3rd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor,N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.2001
10. "Antibodies as Thermolabile Switches:
High Temperature Triggering for the Polymerase Chain Reaction".
Bio/Technology.1994
11. Forensic Science Handbook, vol. III
(Regents/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
12. "Thermostable DNA Polymerases for a
Wide Spectrum of Applications: Comparison of a Robust Hybrid TopoTaq to other
enzymes". In Kieleczawa J. DNA Sequencing II: Optimizing Preparation and
Cleanup. Jones and Bartlett. 2006
13. Nielsen B, et al., Acute and adaptive
responses in humans to exercise in a warm, humid environment, Eur J Physiol
1997
14. Molnar GW, Survival of hypothermia by men
immersed in the ocean. JAMA 1946
15. Paton BC, Accidental hypothermia. Pharmacol
Ther 1983
16. Simpson K, Exposure to cold-starvation and neglect,
in Simpson K (Ed): Modem Trends in Forensic Medicine. St Louis, MO, Mosby Co,
1953.
17. Fitzgerald FT, Hypoglycemia and accidental
hypothermia in an alcoholic population. West J Med 1980
18. Stoner HB et al., Metabolic aspects of
hypothermia in the elderly. Clin Sci 1980
19. MacGregor DC et al., The effects of ether,
ethanol, propanol and butanol on tolerance to deep hypothermia. Dis Chest 1966
20. Cooper KE, Hunter AR, and Keatinge WR,
Accidental hypothermia. Int Anesthesia Clin 1964
21. Keatinge WR. The effects of subcutaneous
fat and of previous exposure to cold on the body temperature, peripheral blood
flow and metabolic rate of men in cold water. J Physiol 1960
22. Sloan REG and Keatinge WR, Cooling rates of
young people swimming in cold water. J Appl Physiol 1973
23. Keatinge WR, Role of cold and immersion
accidents. In Adam JM (Ed) Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat. 1981, Chapter 4,
Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB.
24. Keatinge WR and Evans M, The respiratory
and cardiovascular responses to immersion in cold and warm water. QJ Exp
Physiol 1961
25. Keatinge WR and Nadel JA, Immediate
respiratory response to sudden cooling of the skin. J Appl Physiol 1965
26. Golden F. St C. and Hurvey GR, The “After
Drop” and death after rescue from immersion in cold water. In Adam JM (Ed).
Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat, Chapter 5, Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB 1981.
27. Burton AC and Bazett HC, Study of average
temperature of tissue, of exchange of heat and vasomotor responses in man by
means of bath coloremeter. Am J Physiol 1936
28. Adam JM, Cold Weather: Its characteristics,
dangers and assessment, In Adam JM (Ed). Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat,
Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB1981.
29. Modell JH and Davis JH, Electrolyte changes
in human drowning victims. Anesthesiology 1969
30. Bolte RG, et al., The use of extracorporeal
rewarming in a child submerged for 66 minutes. JAMA 1988
31. Ornato JP, The resuscitation of
near-drowning victims. JAMA 1986
32. Conn AW and Barker CA: Fresh water drowning
and near-drowning — An update.1984;
33. Reh H, On the early postmortem course of
“washerwoman’s skin at the fingertips.” Z Rechtsmed 1984;
34. Gonzales TA, Vance M, Helpern M, Legal
Medicine and Toxicology. New York, Appleton-Century Co, 1937.
35. Peabody AJ, Diatoms and drowning – A review,
Med Sci Law 1980
36. Foged N, Diatoms and drowning — Once
more.Forens Sci Int 1983
37. "Microscale chaotic advection enables
robust convective DNA replication.". Analytical Chemistry. 2013
38. Sourcebook in Forensic Serology,
Immunology, and Biochemistry (U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of
Justice, Washington, D.C.,1983).
39. C. A. Villee et al., Biology (Saunders
College Publishing, Philadelphia, 2nd ed.,1989).
40. Molecular Biology of the Gene
(Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 4th ed., 1987).
41. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Plenum
Press, New York,1985).
42. Human Physiology. An Integrate. 2016
43. Dumas JL and Walker N, Bilateral scapular
fractures secondary to electrical shock. Arch. Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, 1992;
111(5)
44. Stueland DT, et al., Bilateral humeral
fractures from electrically induced muscular spasm. J. of Emerg. Med. 1989
45. Shaheen MA and Sabet NA, Bilateral
simultaneous fracture of the femoral neck following electrical shock. Injury.
1984
46. Rajam KH, et al., Fracture of vertebral
bodies caused by accidental electric shock. J. Indian Med Assoc. 1976
47. Wright RK, Broisz HG, and Shuman M, The
investigation of electrical injuries and deaths. Presented at the meeting of
the American Academy of Forensic Science, Reno, NV, February 2000.
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz